In the same spot and with the same name since 1980 is a - Scaramouche Restaurant Toronto - Buy Reservations
Getting a Reservation at Scaramouche Restaurant Toronto for Today or Tomorrow is Easy!
Buy a verified reservation at Scaramouche Restaurant Toronto from someone who doesn't need theirs anymore.
If there is nothing that fits your schedule, you can bid on your preferred time.
We only list verified Reservations!
All listed Reservations are reviewed by our team before appearing in the calendar or being allowed to answer a bid you place. That's why AppointmentTrader comes with a included Money Back Guarantee for each transaction.
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
Toronto's Best Restaurants that are most frequently booked by customers of Scaramouche Restaurant Toronto
Booked 3 times by Scaramouche Restaurant Toronto customers.
Ranked #3 in Toronto's Best Restaurants.
😍 5/5 - In the same spot and with the same name since 1980 is a
By 👻 @Mark S., 09/04/2022 3:00 am
|
In the same spot and with the same name since 1980 is a very rare achievement in the restaurant business, but Scaramouche has managed it by offering great service and beautiful plating with an amazing city view. The menu is consistent (if a "40 years of Scaramouche Cookbook" were to be published, it wouldn't be very thick), but it's forgivable since my last visit here predated Yelp. The coconut cream pie is still the same, but since everyone orders it, perhaps a seasonal variation? (Peach-coconut in summer, chocolate-coconut in winter... but only alongside the original of course!). We began by splitting the peppercorn pasta entree ($35) as our appetizer- a brilliant move, since it's richness could overwhelm as an entree. Next the expertly executed scallops ($45), and the equally beautiful duck ($45). We both finished (of course) with the pie ($15), but wished we'd shared a single serving (it's small, but filling). To impress Michelin, an amuse course or petit-fours would help, but even without, it's still pretty star-worthy (we shall see soon enough).
0 Replys
0 Comments |
Be the first to Reply |